State v. Mayor, 07 Ma 177 (12-31-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant William Mayor appeals from the concurrent eighteen-month sentences entered in the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court after his guilty pleas to two counts of burglary. On appeal, he raises multiple issues with sentencing: the court's handling of an alleged factual inaccuracy in the presentence investigation report; the court's consideration of alleged conduct that did not result in conviction; the mere assertion in the sentencing entry that the court considered the principles and purposes of sentences and balanced the seriousness and recidivism factors; and,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BowserOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. HenryOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. ViersOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. LatronicaOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.