Legal Opinion

State v. Mayor, 07 Ma 177 (12-31-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2008No. 07 MA 177PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant William Mayor appeals from the concurrent eighteen-month sentences entered in the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court after his guilty pleas to two counts of burglary. On appeal, he raises multiple issues with sentencing: the court's handling of an alleged factual inaccuracy in the presentence investigation report; the court's consideration of alleged conduct that did not result in conviction; the mere assertion in the sentencing entry that the court considered the principles and purposes of sentences and balanced the seriousness and recidivism factors; and,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BowserOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. HenryOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. ViersOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State v. LatronicaOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API