Legal Opinion

State v. Arnett

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2000No. 99-468PublishedCited by 415 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

This case asks whether the sentencing judge violated the statutory requirements of the Revised Code or the constitutional dictates of due process when she acknowledged referring to the Bible during her deliberations, and then quoted a biblical passage on the record at the sentencing proceeding. Because we determine that the trial court complied with the applicable provisions of R.C. Chapter 2929 and that the judge’s reference to the Bible did not impair the fundamental fairness of the proceedings, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the trial court’s sentence.

*213In Part…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Barclay v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by415 opinions

  1. State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BrimacombeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. HodgesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

410 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API