Legal Opinion
Rolland v. Cellucci
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 28, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-30208-KPNPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS (Docket No. 188)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On January 10, 2000, the court approved a settlement agreement which provided, in applicable part, that Plaintiffs are the prevailing parties in this case and, as such, are entitled to reasonable fees and costs incurred through the date of approval. Because the parties could not agree on those fees and costs, Plaintiffs have moved for an award of fees in the amount of $1,510,832 1 and costs of $178,430 pursuant to both the Americans with Disabilities…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Norkunas v. HPT Cambridge, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- System Management, Inc. v. LoiselleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Martinez v. HodgsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Rolland v. CellucciDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Averback v. Pastor Medical Associates P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.