Legal Opinion

Rolland v. Cellucci

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 23, 2001No. Civ.A. 98-30208-KPNPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A SECOND AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS (Docket No. 206)

NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Currently at issue is Plaintiffs’ motion for a second award of attorneys’ fees and costs. For the reasons which follow, the court will allow Plaintiffs’ motion and award them $289,765 in fees and $28,247.10 in costs.

I. Background

Plaintiffs, mentally retarded or developmentally disabled individuals living in nursing homes, filed this class action lawsuit in December of 1998. In January of 2000, the court approved a settlement agreement…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McDonough v. City of QuincyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  2. Laube v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
  3. Rosie D. Ex Rel. John D. v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  4. Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. Main Street NA Parkade, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. Flaa v. Manor Country ClubCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API