Rolland v. Cellucci
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A SECOND AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS (Docket No. 206)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently at issue is Plaintiffs’ motion for a second award of attorneys’ fees and costs. For the reasons which follow, the court will allow Plaintiffs’ motion and award them $289,765 in fees and $28,247.10 in costs.
I. Background
Plaintiffs, mentally retarded or developmentally disabled individuals living in nursing homes, filed this class action lawsuit in December of 1998. In January of 2000, the court approved a settlement agreement…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McDonough v. City of QuincyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Laube v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
- Rosie D. Ex Rel. John D. v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. Main Street NA Parkade, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Flaa v. Manor Country ClubCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.