Legal Opinion

Kirkendall v. Korseberg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in a personal injury action. The sole assignment of error is directed at the admission into evidence of a traffic citation which charged defendant’s decedent with violating the basic rule and a notation on the citation by the district court judge that bail of $10 had been forfeited.

The exhibit was clearly inadmissible. ORS 484.150 prescribes the form of the Uniform Traffic Citation. ORS 484.190 (2) ① permits a defendant who is not charged with a major traffic offense or a felony, to deliver to the court described in the citation a money order or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. DonohoWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Marshall v. MullinOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Jenkins v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Oien v. BourassaOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Casey v. Northwestern Security Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Meyer v. Harvey AluminumOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. LePage v. BumilaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Stevenson v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API