Legal Opinion
Anderson v. City of Pocatello
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1987No. 15703PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
Anderson commenced a tort action against the defendants-respondents on theories of violation of his civil rights (afforded remedy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983), assault and battery, and negligence. The district court granted summary judgment to the respondents, but denied granting attorney’s fees to the respondents. Anderson appeals the former holding; respondents appeal the latter. We affirm the district court’s granting of summary judgment on all counts save the § 1983 claim against the officers. As to count § 1983, a genuine issue of material fact remains to be resolved.
I
In the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by MarriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Monat v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Butler v. ElleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Adams v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.