Legal Opinion

Oien v. Bourassa

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1960PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is an action by plaintiff, Lonise Oien, against the defendant, Donald A. Bonrassa, for personal injury. Subsequent to verdict and judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff moved for a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an adverse ruling on the motion for a new trial.

On May 8, 1957, plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile owned and being operated by her husband (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff’s car) in a southerly direction on highway 99 at a point approximately two miles south of the city of Winston, Oregon. Defendant was at said time and place…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Fromme v. Lang & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Galer v. WEYERHAEUSER TIMBER CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. DeLashmitt v. Journal Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. The People v. MillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Elam v. SoaresOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Young v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Carlson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Bowlds v. Taggesell Pontiac Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API