Legal Opinion
J. D. Harms, Inc. v. Meade
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1936No. 25993. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
J. D. Harms, Inc. (hereinafter spoken of as Harms) obtained a contract with the United States government for the building of a road in Rainier National Park. He sublet a portion of the work by written subcontract with Zora E. Meade, individually and as executrix of the estate of John W. Meade, operating’ as Meade’s Transfer and Garage (hereinafter spoken of as Mrs. Meade). In the subcontract, Harms is called the contractor, and Mrs. Meade is spoken of as the subcontractor. Certain provisions of the subcontract, material to this case, are as follows:
“Whereas, the contractor has entered into a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Black v. WoodrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Jordan v. Indianapolis Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Mowbray Pearson Co. v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Adams v. Washington Brick, Lime & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Brown v. EhlingerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Taylor-Edwards Warehouse & Transfer Co., of Spokane, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Westland Construction Co. v. Chris Berg, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
- Liner v. Armstrong Homes of Bremerton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Byrne v. Bellingham Consolidated School District No. 301Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Reeker v. RemourWashington Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.