Reeker v. Remour
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.—The
question presented is whether or not there is a valid consideration for a service station lease. The plaintiffs, Walter Reeker and wife (respondents here), had conveyed certain property to the defendants, Claud R. Remour and wife (appellants here), and by this action seek to have the deed reformed by making it subject to a service station lease from the Remours to the Reekers. The parties are agreed that the deed was intended to be subject to the lease and that it should be reformed if the lease is valid and binding upon the parties. The trial court, by the judgment appealed from,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewis v. Atlas Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Seggebruch v. StosorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Mowbray Pearson Co. v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- The Nat. Refining Co. v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Stusser v. GottsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Suess v. HealeWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Brem-Rock, Inc. v. WarnackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Geyen v. Time Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955