Legal Opinion

Adams v. Washington Brick, Lime & Manufacturing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1905No. 5501PublishedCited by 12 opinions

■ Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Spokane county, Belt L, entered May 16, 1904, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff, after a trial on tbe merits before tbe court, a jury being waived, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtLoot, J.

In this case respondent interposes a motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment, for the reason that the conclusions of law are not excepted to, and that none of the findings of fact are excepted to save one which has to do with a matter deemed immaterial. This court has held, in the case of Woodhurst v. Cramer, 29 Wash. 40, 69 Pac. 501, that it is unnecessary to except to conclusions of law, where the appellant’s contention is that the findings of fact do not justify the judgment or decree. The motion to dismiss and affirm will therefore be denied.

One George O'. Adams was the owner…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walker v. TuckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Allen v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. In re CilleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1893
  4. Timlin v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Muhlenberg v. HenningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Washington State Hop Producers, Inc. Liquidation Trust v. Goschie Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Co. v. Stoneway Concrete, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Nichols v. CapenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Brown v. EhlingerWashington Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API