Legal Opinion
Young v. Clark
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 2003No. 71905-5PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
65 P.3d 1192 (2003)
149 Wash.2d 130
Colleen Rose YOUNG, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of William Mathis Young, Petitioners,
v.
Arthur CLARK and Jane Doe Clark, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 71905-5.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued September 19, 2002.
Decided April 3, 2003.
Dominic Bacetich, Everett, for petitioners.
Bret Simmons, Bellingham, for respondents.
SANDERS, J.
The question is whether the filing restrictions of former RCW 4.12.020(3) (1941), amended by Laws of 2001, ch. 45, § 2, limit subject matter jurisdiction as among superior courts or whether…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Shoop v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Young v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Five Corners Family Farmers v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Shoop v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Shoop v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Cole v. HARVEYLAND, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.