Legal Opinion

Five Corners Family Farmers v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2011No. 84632-4PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 By statute, the legislature requires a permit to withdraw public groundwater or to construct a well to do so. RCW 90.44.050. The statute also provides exemptions from the permit requirement for certain uses. This case concerns the scope of one of those exemptions. We conclude that, under the plain language of the statute, withdrawals of groundwater for stock-watering purposes are not limited to any particular quantity by RCW 90.44-.050. Accordingly, we affirm the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to the respondents. We also affirm the superior court’s refusal to grant summary…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Citizens Alliance for Property Rights Legal Fund v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hornish Trust v. King CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. Saint-LouisWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Ralph v. Department of Natural ResourcesWashington Supreme Court · 2014

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API