Legal Opinion

Perkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1912No. 1397PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

The appellant was prosecuted in the County Court for an aggravated assault and battery on Julius Venable, was found guilty and fined $25 and thirty days confinement in the jail.

Heretofore this court reversed Perkins v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 508, 138 S. W. Rep., 133, appealed by him, which grew out of the same transaction, in which case he was convicted of an aggravated assault on Mable Venable, but the evidence as reported by the opinion in that case is altogether different from the evidence shown by the record in this case. So the charge of the court in this case is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. MacKey and Grice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Teem v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Bradfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Ethridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API