Cunningham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PBENDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted for keeping a bawdy house, and the punishment prescribed by law assessed against her.
Our statute (art. 500, P. C.) is that any person who shall directly keep a bawdy house in any house, or shall knowingly permit the keeping of a bawdy house in any house owned, leased, occupied or controlled by him, shall be deemed guilty of keeping or knowingly permitting to be kept, as the case niay be, a bawdy house, and on conviction shall be punished, etc. A bawdy house is defined (art. 496, P. C.) as one kept for prostitution or where prostitutes are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Watts v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
- Novy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Mealer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Perkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Carroz v. KaminiskiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Landers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Grimes v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Mothershead v. MilfeldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.