Ethridge v. State

PREHDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant appeals from a conviction of slander. We have carefully read and considered the statement. of facts and record in this case more than once. The evidence amply sustains the verdict.

Appellant contends, and presents the question in various ways, that the evidence did not establish that the slanderous language used by him was with reference to the young girl it was alleged it was used about. It is unnecessary to detail the evidence. Ho useful purpose could be subserved by doing so. There can be no question from the evidence but that the language used was…