Legal Opinion

Villa Los Alamos Homeowners Ass'n v. State Farm General Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 2011No. A128443PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

In MacKinnon v. Truck Ins. Exchange (2003) 31 Cal.4th 635 [3 Cal.Rptr.3d 228, 73 P.3d 1205] (MacKinnon), our Supreme Court determined that the standard pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability (CGL) policy was intended to exclude coverage for injuries resulting from events commonly regarded as environmental pollution. The court therefore rejected a broader, literal interpretation of the clause that would foreclose coverage for any and all injuries arising from harmful substances. (Id. at pp. 649, 653.) So construed, the court further held that it was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Julian v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Axis Reinsurance Co. v. Telekenex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. JRK Property Holdings, Inc. v. Colony Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Palla Farms, LLC v. Gemini Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API