Legal Opinion

Burns v. Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1901No. Sac. No. 829PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Appeal from a judgment for the defendants and from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The suit was brought for the conversion of certain gold and gold-bearing rock, of which, it is alleged in the complaint, the plaintiff was, on the day named, the “owner . . . and lawfully possessed,” and which, it is alleged, the defendants “wrongfully and unlawfully, and against the will of [plaintiff], took and carried away,” and “converted ... to their own use.”

The facts of the case, as found by the court, are, that the defendants Schoenfeld, Adler, and James, who were the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. People Ex Rel. Kellogg v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Bowen v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. McClintock v. BrydenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Seeley v. BirdsallNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Futurecraft Corp. v. Clary Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. United States v. Edison R. NogueiraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Bagg v. New Jersey Loan CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Williams v. WeisserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API