Legal Opinion
In re the Adoption of Anonymous
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided June 26, 1973PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nathan R. Sobel, S.
The issue in this proceeding is one of first impression in this or any other jurisdiction. The problem however has been with the courts since the first utilization by the medical profession of artificial insemination.
As a preliminary, there are two types of artificial insemination. Homologous insemination is the process by which the wife is artificially impregnated with the semen of her husband. This procedure is referred to as AIH (artificial insemination husband) and creates no legal problems since the child is considered the natural child of the husband and wife.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Commissioner of Public Welfare v. KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. SorensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re the Estate of MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Gursky v. GurskyNew York Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- John A. v. BuzzancaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Laura WW. v. Peter WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- C. M. v. C. C.Cumberland County Family Court · 1977
- Cm v. CcNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- K. S. v. G. S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.