Legal Opinion
Gursky v. Gursky
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1963PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMark A. Costantino, J.
The plaintiff alleged three causes of action in an amended pleading, the first of which was for annulment, and the others for separation on the ground of abandonment and cruel and inhuman treatment. Plaintiff also alleged that there was no issue of the marriage. The court dismissed plaintiff’s action for annulment for failure of proof. Defendant wife had interposed an answer and counter-claimed for separation. On the trial and after plaintiff’s dismissal defendant moved for leave to amend her answer to allege a counterclaim for annulment. The motion to amend was granted without objection…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Lynn v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Commissioner of Public Welfare v. KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Beadleston v. . BeadlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Romano v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. SorensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- K.B. v. N.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Wener v. WenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- John A. v. BuzzancaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- In re the Adoption of AnonymousNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.