Legal Opinion

John A. v. Buzzanca

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1998No. Nos. G022147, G022157PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1412Opinion

SILLS, P. J.—

Introduction

Jaycee was bom because Luanne and John Buzzanca agreed to have an embryo genetically unrelated to either of them implanted in a woman — a surrogate — who would carry and give birth to the child for them. After the fertilization, implantation and pregnancy, Luanne and John split up, and the question of who are Jaycee’s lawful parents came before the trial court.

Luanne claimed that she and her erstwhile husband were the lawful parents, but John disclaimed any responsibility, financial or otherwise. The woman who gave birth also appeared in the case to make it…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Zacharia D.California Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Johnson v. CalvertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re C.K.G.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Renee J. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Elisa B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-JenkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API