Legal Opinion

People v. Sorensen

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1968No. Crim. 11708PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of violating section 270 of the Penal Code (willful failure to provide for his minor child), a misdemeanor.

The settled statement of facts recites that seven years after defendant’s marriage it was medically determined that he was sterile. His wife desired a child, either by artificial insemination or by adoption, and at first defendant refused to consent. About 15 years after the marriage defendant agreed to the artificial insemination of his wife. Husband and wife, then residents of San Joaquin County, consulted a physician in San Francisco.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of LundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Dixon v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Gursky v. GurskyNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. SwiggyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. WallachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Elisa B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. K.B. v. N.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-JenkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API