Legal Opinion

Scharmann v. Dayton Hudson Corp.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1995No. S-93-500PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiff-appellant Gladys W. Scharmann appeals from a jury verdict entered in Douglas County District Court in favor of defendant-appellee Dayton Hudson Corporation, doing business as Target Stores. Scharmann contends that the district court erred in its jury instructions. We affirm.

On September 24, 1991, Scharmann was struck by a shopping cart while on the premises of Target’s store at 90th and Maple Streets in Omaha, Nebraska. The shopping cart knocked Scharmann to the ground, causing physical injuries. Consequently, Scharmann filed a negligence action against Target.

In its jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dotzler v. TuttleNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burns v. Veterans of Foreign WarsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Carnes v. WeesnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Vacanti v. Master Electronics Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. McDermott v. Platte County Agricultural SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Reavis v. SolminskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Farmers and Merchants Bank v. GramsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sedlak Aerial Spray, Ltd. v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. LoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API