Legal Opinion

Reavis v. Solminski

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1996No. S-94-288PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanphier, J.

Alleging she was sexually assaulted, Mary Reavis filed a civil action against the alleged attacker, James Slominski, D.D.S. The petition stated two causes of action — one for the tort of sexual assault and one for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Slominski denied those allegations and further alleged that any contact with Reavis was consensual. Trial before a jury commenced in the district court for Richardson County on January 12, 1994. At the close of Reavis’ case, Slominski’s motion for a directed verdict was overruled. At the close of all the evidence, Slominski…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Nichols v. BusseNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Frank v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re Application A-16642Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Koehler v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mischke v. MischkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API