Neagley v. Neagley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 244, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Northumberland Co., Sept. T., 1911, No. 122, allowing divorce in case of Jacob A. Neagley v. Mabel Neagley. Libel for divorce. Before Cummings, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Errors assigned among others were (3) in allowing alimony pendente lite and (5) allowing divorce.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The libelant and the respondent were married October 23, 1881, and have one son, aged about twenty-eight years. Between 1902 and March 24, 1909, while they lived in Milton as husband and wife, the respondent made three trips to the Pacific coast. After these trips she importuned her husband to leave his employment in Pennsylvania and go to California, because, as *567she thought, opportunities there were greater, and because her health was better there. According to the preponderance of testimony she finally determined to go to the Pacific coast, whether her husband would go…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ingersoll v. IngersollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- King v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Olson v. OlsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Boyd's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mertz v. MertzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Totino v. TotinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Rosa v. RosaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Doemling v. DoemlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Pomerantz v. PomerantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.