King v. King
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal by libelant, from decree of C. P. Tioga Co., Sept. T., 1905, No. 300, refusing divorce in case of George W. King v. Emogene King. Libel for divorce on the ground of desertion. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Errors assigned were various findings of fact, refusal of divorce and order making absolute rule for alimony.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion- by
Rice, P. J.,
To the libel charging willful and malicious desertion. and' praying for a decree in divorce a. v. m. the respondent filed an answer denying the charge and averring that the libelant drove *35her from his home without just or reasonable cause. The'case was heard in open court, and after a full consideration of the testimony and reconsideration thereof upon reargument, the court found the facts to be, that the separation was forced by the libelant; that he actually drove the respondent from his home, and refused to allow her to return, notwithstanding her earnest and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Ingersoll v. IngersollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- Olson v. OlsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Hull v. HullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Vanleer v. VanleerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Neagley v. NeagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Lodge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Loughney v. LoughneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Price v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Naylor v. NaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.