Legal Opinion

Mertz v. Mertz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1935No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The final decree in this divorce proceeding was granted the husband upon the ground that the wife’s admitted withdrawal from their long-established home amounted to a “wilful and malicious desertion,” within the meaning of “The Divorce Law” of May 2, 1929, P. L. 1237.

As required, in the absence of a jury trial, (Langeland v. Langeland, 108 Pa. Superior Ct. 375, 164 A. 816) we have, upon this appeal by the wife, considered all the evidence and have reached the independent conclusion that the decree should be affirmed.

The respondent defended upon two grounds: (1) That…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Ingersoll v. IngersollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  3. Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Howe v. HoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Langeland v. LangelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rinoldo v. RinoldoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Ewing v. EwingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Winner v. WinnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Barnes v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API