Gordon v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 240, Jan. T., 1903, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Ct., Oct. T., 1902, No. 140, reversing judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1900, No. 1, on verdict for defendant in case of Phebe B. Gordon v. Charles M. Gordon. Appeal from Superior Court. For the facts see 23 Pa. Superior Ct. 261. Error assigned was the judgment of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mestrezat,
The Superior Court very properly held that “ the whole case, including the good faith of the 'offer of the respondent, was for the jury.” The learned judge, W. D. Porter, of the Superior Court, has stated in his opinion very clearly and concisely the facts disclosed by the testimony, and they were amply sufficient, as he conclusively shows, to justify their submission to the jury on the question of the good faith of the defendant’s offer to renew his marital relations with the plaintiff. We think, therefore that the trial judge was clearly in error in directing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McClurg's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Prather v. PratherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
3Cited by17 opinions
- Neagley v. NeagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Wilhelm v. WilhelmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Zimmerman v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Helm v. HelmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.