Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Stockstill

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1994PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

This case presents for review the judgment of the Court of Appeals sustaining jury verdicts in favor of the plaintiff, Eugene S. Forrester, for compensatory damages against the two individual defendants, Dr. Ronald Stockstill and Dr. Robert Kisabeth, vacating and remanding for a new trial the award of punitive damages against the individual defendants, and vacating the jury verdict for compensatory damages and dismissing the claim against the corporate defendant, Midsouth Regional Blood Center. Upon review of the record, this Court finds the evidence insufficient to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Anderson v. Standard Register Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Crabtree Masonry Co. v. C & R Construction, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Chism v. Mid-South Milling Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Whittaker v. Care-More, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Newcomb v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Sullivan v. Baptist Memorial HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Conatser v. Clarksville Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Reynolds v. Ozark Motor Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API