Strouth v. Wilkison
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MacLaughlin, Justice.
This is an action to recover damages for misrepresentation and breach of contract. Defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding plaintiffs damages in the sum of $41,300, together with costs and disbursements. The trial court decided the case on the theory of fraudulent misrepresentation. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The material facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, are doctors on the staff of the East Kange Clinic at Virginia, Minnesota. Defendant, at the time the contract was entered, was employed as an electrician…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Lowrey v. DingmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Bergquist v. KreidlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Rosenquist v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Staten v. HammerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
3Cited by26 opinions
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.