Legal Opinion

Rosenquist v. Baker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 26, 1948No. 34,749PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

At the outset of their brief, defendants take the position on appeal that no cause of action was proved in the court below, and they are content to have the case tested on the sole testimony of plaintiff and his witnesses.

Defendants, hereinafter referred to as Mr. and Mrs. Baker, operated a restaurant known as the Northland Cafe in St. Cloud, Minnesota. The owner of the building in which the restaurant was located was one Frank Graham,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rockefeller v. MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Reynolds v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Humphrey v. SieversSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Defiel v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API