Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Black

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1991No. CA 90-104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

The employer in this workers’ compensation case, Hampton and Crain, and its insurance carrier, CNA Insurance Companies, appeal from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that the appellee is entitled to a vocational rehabilitation evaluation. The appellants contend on appeal that the appellee is not entitled to the evaluation because he “has not shown that he is entitled to permanent disability benefits.”

When reviewing a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, we must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Gina Marie Farms v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Smelser v. S.H.&J. Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Johnson Construction Co. v. NobleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cagle Fabricating and Steel, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. RisperCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Rogers v. Wood ManufacturingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  4. TEC v. FalknerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API