Legal Opinion

TEC v. Falkner

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1992No. CA 91-211PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

TEC appeals from an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission and advances several arguments. We dismiss the appeal because we conclude that the order appealed from is not final and appealable.

Arkansas Code Annotated § 11-9-711(b)(2) (1987) provides that appeals from the Commission to this court shall be allowed as in other civil actions. For an order to be appealable, it must be final. To be final, an order must dismiss the parties from the court, discharge them from the action, or conclude their rights as to the subject matter in controversy. American…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gina Marie Farms v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Samuels Hide and Metal Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  3. American Mutual Insurance v. Argonaut Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Mid-State Construction v. SealyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Hernandez v. Simmons IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. Southern Steel & WireCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Humphrey v. Faulkner Nursing CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Rowell v. Curt Bean Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Daniel v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. AngusCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API