Banet v. City of Philadelphia
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
per Curiam,
The six judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the judgments are affirmed.
Opinion
by Hoffman, J.,
In Support of Reversal :
Appellants contend that the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury on the doctrine of exclusive control.
On April 14, 1965, a 48" water main broke at the intersection of Frankford and Torresdale Avenues in Northeast Philadelphia. The water pipe was manufactured of cast iron and laid in the ground about 1908. Appellants, who maintained business establishments in the general area, suffered extensive water damage from the resultant flood…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Davies v. McDowell National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Izzi v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- MacK v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Hollywood Shop, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Todman v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1978
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974