MacK v. Reading Company
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
The facts of this accident constitute such a typical situation for the application of the rule of evidence commonly known as the doctrine of “exclusive control” that the case might well serve as a classical example of the need and use of that doctrine for the ascertainment of liability.
One Everly was operating a tractor-trailer in the nighttime along II. S. Route 1 near Parkland, Pennsylvania, when a freight train passed in the opposite direction along a track of the Reading Company, this track being located at that point on an embankment about 10 or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Zahniser v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- MacDonald v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Pope v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Flagiello v. Pennsylvania HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Brandon v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Davies v. McDowell National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Haddon v. LotitoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Izzi v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.