Withers v. Tucker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to set aside all proceedings in which plaintiff appeared without a guardian ad litem occurring prior to plaintiff’s claim of mental incompetence.
Sec. 260.22, Stats., is the applicable statute with respect to the necessity of the appointment of the guardian ad litem in a court action for personal injuries.
The statute provides as follows:
“260.22 Appearance by guardian or guardian ad litem. When a party to an action or proceeding is a minor, or when the court or judge has reason to believe that a party is mentally…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of EannelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Wiesmann v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Menz v. BeebeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vara v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Brewer v. BrewerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Shelley v. ElfstromCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- John J. Donnelly v. Honorable Barrington D. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- John J. Donnelly v. Honorable Barrington D. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.