Legal Opinion

Teasdale v. Teasdale

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1953PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

It is conceded that five separate requirements must be met by the trustees before a new trial will be granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence:

1. The evidence must have come to their knowledge after the trial.

2. They must not have been negligent in seeking to discover it.

3. The evidence must be material to the issue.

4. The evidence must not be merely cumulative to testimony introduced at the trial.

5. It must be reasonably probable that a different result would be reached on a new trial.

There is no argument on the first point.

Applications for a new trial on this ground are looked…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Gray v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. Estate of EannelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Herchelroth v. MaharWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Estate of JavornikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API