Vara v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The petition requesting a new trial was in the form of a petition for relief under sec. 974.06, Stats., and therefore improper because a postconviction petition under that section is restricted to jurisdictional and constitutional issues. The petition under sec. 974.06 is not a substitute for a motion for a new trial even though a new trial is requested. Nor is the petition a substitute for an appeal. Peterson v. State (1972), 54 Wis. 2d 370, 195 N. W. 2d 837; State ex rel. Warren, v. County Court (1972), 54 Wis. 2d 613, 197 N. W. 2d 1; see also State v. Langston (1971), 53 Wis. 2d 228, 191…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ShoffnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. EsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Walberg v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CooganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Bergenthal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Charles C. Coogan v. Gary McCaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.