Legal Opinion

Vara v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1972No. State 62PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The petition requesting a new trial was in the form of a petition for relief under sec. 974.06, Stats., and therefore improper because a postconviction petition under that section is restricted to jurisdictional and constitutional issues. The petition under sec. 974.06 is not a substitute for a motion for a new trial even though a new trial is requested. Nor is the petition a substitute for an appeal. Peterson v. State (1972), 54 Wis. 2d 370, 195 N. W. 2d 837; State ex rel. Warren, v. County Court (1972), 54 Wis. 2d 613, 197 N. W. 2d 1; see also State v. Langston (1971), 53 Wis. 2d 228, 191…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. ShoffnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. EsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Peterson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Walberg v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. CooganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. Bergenthal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Charles C. Coogan v. Gary McCaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API