Com. of Pa. v. Coyne
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinio®' by
Keller, J.,
Appellant was jointly indicted and tried with Thomas Dolan and Thomas Goslin on the charge of keeping a gambling house and being a common gambler. They were all convicted. Dolan and Goslin did not appeal. Coyne has appealed, claiming that the evidence was not sufficient to support a conviction.
The Commonwealth’s evidence showed that a gambling house, known as the Monaca Club, was maintained at 3802 Forbes Street, Pittsburgh; that there was a bar on the first floor, and a casino or gambling room, with gambling games and apparatus, on the second floor; and evidence was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . KoernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Sorenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Ettinger v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Smith Et Ux. v. Amer. Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. SINDELSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Levin v. Van HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.