Legal Opinion

Com. of Pa. v. Coyne

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1934No. Appeal 54PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinio®' by

Keller, J.,

Appellant was jointly indicted and tried with Thomas Dolan and Thomas Goslin on the charge of keeping a gambling house and being a common gambler. They were all convicted. Dolan and Goslin did not appeal. Coyne has appealed, claiming that the evidence was not sufficient to support a conviction.

The Commonwealth’s evidence showed that a gambling house, known as the Monaca Club, was maintained at 3802 Forbes Street, Pittsburgh; that there was a bar on the first floor, and a casino or gambling room, with gambling games and apparatus, on the second floor; and evidence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . KoernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Sorenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Ettinger v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Smith Et Ux. v. Amer. Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Commonwealth v. SINDELSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Levin v. Van HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API