Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1909No. 2,574PublishedCited by 34 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa.

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIPS, District Judge.

The plaintiff in error (hereinafter designated the defendant) was indicted in connection with one Prank Hodge, in two counts, predicated of section 5478, Rev. St. U. S. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3696), for forcibly breaking into a building used in part as a post office of the United States, in the town of Van Meter, Dallas county, Iowa. There was another count in the indictment, predicated of section 5475 of the statute (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3694), for stealing property in said post office belonging to the Post Office Department, to wit, postal funds of the value…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. United States v. Howard Evans Mason, Jr. And Jerry Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. Grantello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Munson v. McClaughryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API