Legal Opinion
United States v. Stephen Saccoccia
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1994No. 93-50624PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Stephen A. Saccoccia was indicted for aiding and abetting the laundering of drug proceeds in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1957. Saccoccia appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss his indictment for violations of both the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Swiss-Ameriean Treaty under which he was extradited. We affirm the district court’s ruling that Saccoceia’s prosecution in California does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause and remand the case for trial. The extradition issues raised by Saccoccia are not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Keith E. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Ronald D. ChickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- David Lee CLAREY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen S. GREGG, U.S. Marshall for the Southern District of California, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Noriega-Perez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.