Legal Opinion
Noriega-Perez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 1999No. 96-70513PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROLL, District Judge:
Petitioner Alberto Noriega-Perez appeals from a summary decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) imposing a monetary fine for civil document fraud. The civil action was commenced after Noriega-Perez had entered a plea of guilty to conspiracy to possess forged, counterfeit, and false documents. The summary decision is affirmed.
I. Background
On December 2, 1992, Noriega-Perez was indicted in the District Court for the Southern District of California for conspiracy to possess forged, counterfeit, and false immigration documents. Thereafter, Noriega-Perez entered a plea…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Peter MacKbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Massachusetts v. Schering-Plough Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Simpson v. BoukerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Jerrold E. Rivera v. Margaret Pugh, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.