United States v. Hickey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MCKEOWN; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT.
*926McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal stems from a massive fraud scheme that resulted in protracted civil and criminal proceedings spanning more than ten years. John A. Hickey (“Hickey”) and his business partner, Mamie Tang (“Tang”), induced over 700 individuals to invest approximately $20 million in two real estate development funds. Their plan was to purchase land in Northern California, prepare the land for residential development, and then resell the properties to developers at a profit. As it turned out, however, the investors were…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. RedlightningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Carroll v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Rodriguez-RosadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Gregory Torlai, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.