Legal Opinion
Raczynski v. Raczynski
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 2, 1976No. 48367PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.
April 7, 1975, Ronald Raczynski was adjudged to be “technically guilty of contempt in failing to make child support payments after October, 1974” and given ten days to “catch up” to avoid being “officially . . adjudged to be in contempt of court.” The appealing father of two children, a boy 16 and a girl 11, assails the decision because it fails to give him credit for child support overpayments totalling around $7,000 he voluntarily made before October, 1974, as well as a $11,750 interest in real estate conveyed to the mother for child support use — a ruling that is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Mason v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Headley v. HeadleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Loomis v. LoomisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Ediger v. EdigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Epperson v. EppersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- State Department of Human Services Ex Rel. K.A.G. v. T.D.G.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- McNeal v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Finley v. MorrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. MasaniaiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.