Legal Opinion

Finley v. Morrow

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1985No. 14034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Appellant Robert Harold Morrow appeals from an order overruling his motion to quash garnishment. Respondent, Robert’s former wife, was seeking to collect back due child support ordered by a decree dissolving the parties’ marriage. The court’s order denying appellant’s motion is appeal-able under § 512.020, RSMo 1978 as a “special order after final judgment”. Anderson v. Anderson, 404 S.W.2d 206, 207 (Mo.App.1966).

Appellant’s point relied on states:

The trial court erroneously construed and applied the law in overruling appellant’s motion to quash because appellant was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. KohmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Handly v. LyonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. M v. MMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Webb v. WebbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Anderson v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holdener v. FieserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Starkey v. StarkeyWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State, Division of Child Support Enforcement v. PettawayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Fantl v. BernsenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API