Legal Opinion

Vierling v. Fry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1946No. Appeal, 57PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

In this accident case the jury returned a verdict for defendant but plaintiff complains that the court gave them improper instructions on the subject of contributory negligence.

Driving his automobile at night on an 18-foot concrete highway, plaintiff ran into the rear of defendant’s truck which, heavily laden with coal, was traveling ahead in the same direction. He testified that he was blinded by the bright headlights of a car approaching from the opposite direction, that he went approximately 150 feet with his vision thus obscured, and that immediately…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farley v. VentrescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Buohl v. Lockport Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Ward v. Babbitt, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Foley v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Nelson v. Damus Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colonial Trust Co. v. Elmer C. Breuer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Coward v. RuckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Stafford v. Roadway Transit Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Toenges v. SchleihaufSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. StephensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API