Ward v. Babbitt, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 392, Jan. T., 1921, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1918, No. 4386, on verdict for plaintiffs, in case of Edward N. Ward, Sr., and Edward N. Ward, Jr., by Edward N. Ward, Sr., his nest friend, v. B. T. Babbitt, Inc. Motion by appellees to quash all assignments of error and to quash appeal. The opinion of the Supreme Court states in substance the assignments of error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
A motion has been made to quash the appeal in this case on several grounds. The eight assignments of error may be divided into three groups for the purpose of consideration of the questions raised.
The fourth, fifth and sixth are based upon the charge of the court. No exception was taken thereto before the jury retired; under such circumstances the errors complained of cannot be reviewed: McConnell v. Penna. R. R. Co., 206 Pa. 370; Mackowski v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co., 265 Pa. 34; Allegro v. Rural Valley Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 268 Pa. 333. Even the taking of an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Sikorski v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Knobeloch v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Curtis v. WinstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Allegro v. Rural Valley Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Northern Trust Co. v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Thomas v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- William Zoller Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Keck v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Robinson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.