Legal Opinion
Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 19, 1934No. 281PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This was a petition by a former attorney . for the plaintiff, and one of its counsel, to declare void for lack of jurisdiction certain proceedings, in which it had been previously decided that they had abandoned the suit and were not entitled to any fees for their services. Woodbury v. Jergens Co. (C. C. A.) 61 F.(2d) 736. It will not be necessary to repeat what appears in our former opinion ; we discuss the questions now raised, assuming an acquaintance with its contents. After it was handed down, the petitioners moved for a reargument on the ground that, as both they…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Ingersoll v. CoramSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
- Chesley v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Suzanne Ogla Broughten v. Grover Voss, Ruden, Barnett, McClosky & Schuster, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Exact Software North America v. Infocon Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.