Legal Opinion
DerGazarian v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided October 25, 1993No. Civ. 93-5004PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.
On this 22nd day of October, 1993, comes now before the court for consideration defendant Dow Chemical Company’s motion for partial summary judgment. Also before the court is plaintiffs’ response to said motion. The court has considered the pleadings and is now ready to rule. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that the motion for partial summary judgment should be and hereby is granted in part and denied in part.
1. Statement of the Case
In a second amended complaint filed on February 4, 1993, plaintiffs alleged that the defendant…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bingham v. Terminix International Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
- Higgins v. Monsanto Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Ell v. S.E.T. Landscape Design, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Goodwin v. BaconWashington Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.