Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Terminix International Co.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 25, 1994No. 4:93-cv-00044PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Tom S. LEE, District Judge.

Defendants Miles, Inc. and FMC Corporation have separately moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which motions are now before the court for consideration. Plaintiff William L. Bingham has responded to both motions and the court, having reviewed the memoranda of authorities submitted by the parties, together with attachments, concludes that the motions are well taken and should be granted.

Plaintiff, who apparently has been diagnosed with lung cancer, brought this action charging that his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Billy Joe Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Papas v. Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Worm v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Malone v. American Cyanamid Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Higgins v. Monsanto Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
  5. Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API