Legal Opinion

Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1997PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the summary judgments entered in favor of appellees, Hygienic Sanitation Company and The Dow Chemical Company. Herein, we are presented with a question of first impression in this Commonwealth. Whether state tort claims are preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 136, et seq. Upon review, we affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of Hygienic. However, we affirm only in part the summary judgment entered in favor of Dow, reverse in part and remand for trial in accordance with the provisions of this opinion.

Her…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Montanya v. McGonegalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Ackerman v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. Coffey v. Minwax Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Floyd v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API